Ctrl + KGeneral Discussion
Ctrl + KBy the way, how's your experience with BusyBox? Because I just can't use distros with it, there's not enough features in it's coreutils implementation for me. I used lots of distros, but eventually stuck with Debian, because it just works.
128 Kilometers an hour!
MattKC wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2023 1:57 am Laptop hardware is always the toughest to support. For various reasons, laptops just have way more custom hardware in them, while desktops are all pretty much the same. And unless those laptops go out of their way to support Linux (or happen to be popular with Linux users), it's fairly common to have some kind of issue. Hackintosh has the same problem naturally.
I know no one likes hearing about Arch, but I have had far less hardware issues with Arch than Ubuntu, I think because Arch has newer packages/drivers. But it's an ongoing problem for Linux, unless you use a laptop that's well supported (from memory, mostly Thinkpads and Dell Inspirons).
Code: Select all
<code> #####
#######
# ##O#O##
###### ### #VVVVV#
## # ## VVV ##
## ### ### #### ### ### ##### ##### # ##
## # ## ### ## ## ## ## ## # ##
## # ## ## ## ## ## ### # ###
## ### ## ## ## ## ### QQ# ##Q
## # ### ## ## ## ## ## ## QQQQQQ# #QQQQQQ
## ## ### # ## ## ### ### ## ## QQQQQQQ# #QQQQQQQ
############ ### #### #### #### ### ##### ##### QQQQQ#######QQQQQ
</code>/s, i use arch
Very swell. What hardware are you using? How well does it handle common tasks? I have a Core 2 Duo laptop somewhere, I'd love to try running a freak of nature OS like that.
Lovely setup! However, it is recommended that you directly upload the image here due to concerns about link rots. I've uploaded the file here so you don't have to but be mindful about it next time.ReleaseTheGeese wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 10:42 pm Very swell. What hardware are you using? How well does it handle common tasks? I have a Core 2 Duo laptop somewhere, I'd love to try running a freak of nature OS like that.
On the subject of my own OSes and setup:
https://www.thran.uk/img/desktops_nov2021.jpg - an older photo of them, for anyone curious.
- My main laptop (a late 2017 MacBook Air), Mac OS 12.7.3.
- My hefty Ryzen 7 desktop has a dual booting setup with Void Linux for hax'ing fun, and Windows 10 LTSC for gaming fun.
- I also keep an old Thinkpad running Debian for the times I need Linux in a hurry.
I am now staying at good old Arch Linux with occasional booting to LTSB 2019 for dealing with Windows-sensitive softwares
Is macOS not just a rename from OS X though?
Welcome to the forum! It is nice to see people are seriously moving out of that hellscape for the past monthsLOTO wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 10:01 am First post on this forum. Greetings, ya primitive screwheads.
As of the death of WIndows 10, I've officially made the jump to Linux. Using Mint Cinnamon, and I feel pretty at home. Inspired my Matt's work of installing stuff on hardware not meant for it, I dusted off my old college laptop, slapped an SSD in there, and did a test run of Linux using that.
Now I've put it on my main desktop PC. Unfortunately, a bunch of the really obscure stuff I've enjoyed making use of in WIndows just isn't looking like it's all that possible, so I've put Windows 10 on a separate drive so I can boot into that if I ever need to, like, run DOS games at 320x200p.
Unfortunately I've already tried DOSBox-X and I get absolutely horrid screen tearing, no matter the vsync setting. I'll give Pure Unleashed a look at some point.flatrute wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 11:10 am For DOS games, using forks like DOSBox-X and DOSBox Pure Unleashed are better than keeping a copy of Windows around.
Now that is a first... I assume that the DOSBox-X build you used was linked to SDL1? It is a real old library (like, back in the 9x days) that was only "maintained" via a compatibility layer with SDL2 (that is now also under maintenance since the release of SDL3) and thus are not behaving well with the current Wayland ecosystem of modern Linux.LOTO wrote: ↑Sun Oct 19, 2025 1:00 pm Unfortunately I've already tried DOSBox-X and I get absolutely horrid screen tearing, no matter the vsync setting. I'll give Pure Unleashed a look at some point.
My solution was to use a decade old, obscure, Korean fork of DOSBox called DOSBox Daum, which works exactly the way I need it to. It does advertise a native Linux release, but as a total noob to the ecosystem I have no idea how to actually install it since it was only ever released on the creator's website as a standalone download.
I should be clear that the screen tearing was also present on Windows. Literally the ONLY version of DOSBox I was able to find that didn't have that issue was the Daum fork.flatrute wrote: ↑Mon Oct 20, 2025 12:39 am Now that is a first... I assume that the DOSBox-X build you used was linked to SDL1? It is a real old library (like, back in the 9x days) that was only "maintained" via a compatibility layer with SDL2 (that is now also under maintenance since the release of SDL3) and thus are not behaving well with the current Wayland ecosystem of modern Linux.
Not in a million years.
I bought a Thinkpad L13 Gen 4 as a stopgap until I have the budget to go with a Framework machine and as soon as I saw Windows 11 I immediately wiped the drive and installed Debian 13 into it